Skip to main content
Andrew J. Pincus

Andrew J. Pincus

Partner
T +1 202 263 3220
F +1 202 263 5220
  • RSS Icon
News & Publications
  • AddRemove
  • Build a Report 
Media Coverage
17 May 2013
Thomson Reuters News & Insight
Litigation & Dispute Resolution partner Andy Pincus' (Washington, DC) arguments on behalf of Delaware's Chancery Court are quoted from the case before the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, Delaware Coalition for Open Government Inc. v. The Hon. Leo E. Strine Jr. et al.
Media Coverage
17 May 2013
The Wall Street Journal (subscription required)
Litigation & Dispute Resolution partner Andy Pincus' (Washington, DC) arguments on behalf of Delaware's Chancery Court are cited from the case before the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, Delaware Coalition for Open Government Inc. v. The Hon. Leo E. Strine Jr. et al.
Media Coverage
16 May 2013
Delawareonline.com
Litigation & Dispute Resolution partner Andy Pincus' (Washington, DC) arguments on behalf of Delaware's Chancery Court are cited from the case before the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, Delaware Coalition for Open Government Inc. v. The Hon. Leo E. Strine Jr. et al.
Media Coverage
16 May 2013
Bloomberg Businessweek
Litigation & Dispute Resolution partner Andy Pincus' (Washington, DC) arguments on behalf of Delaware's Chancery Court are quoted from the case before the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, Delaware Coalition for Open Government Inc. v. The Hon. Leo E. Strine Jr. et al.
Media Coverage
16 May 2013
Thomson Reuters News & Insight
Litigation & Dispute Resolution partner Andy Pincus (Washington, DC) is mentioned as representing Delaware's Chancery Court in a case before the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (Delaware Coalition for Open Government Inc. v. The Hon. Leo E. Strine Jr. et al.) and noted as a "prominent appellant specialist."
Media Coverage
16 May 2013
Law360
Litigation & Dispute Resolution partner Andy Pincus' (Washington, DC) arguments on behalf of Delaware's Chancery Court are quoted from the case before the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, Delaware Coalition for Open Government Inc. v. The Hon. Leo E. Strine Jr. et al.
Media Coverage
16 May 2013
Thomson Reuters News & Insight
Litigation & Dispute Resolution partner Andy Pincus (Washington, DC) is quoted on the ongoing debate over the costs of litigation and court decisions involving businesses.
Media Coverage
14 May 2013
Thomson Reuters News & Insight
Litigation & Dispute Resolution partner Andy Pincus' (Washington, DC) brief on behalf of BSA The Software Alliance is cited in an article discussing the Supreme Court's patent decision in Bowman v. Monsanto.
Media Coverage
14 May 2013
The Daily Journal (subscription required)
Litigation & Dispute Resolution partner Andy Pincus (Washington, DC) is quoted on the Supreme Court's patent decision in Bowman v. Monsanto.
Media Coverage
29 April 2013
The Litigation Daily
In an op-ed, Litigation & Dispute Resolution partner Andy Pincus (Washington, DC) responds to Michael D. Goldhaber's recent Litigation Daily column, "The Zombification of the Corporate Alien Tort."
Legal Update
18 April 2013
Mayer Brown Legal Update
In Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum, No. 10-1491, the US Supreme Court has ruled that the Alien Tort Statute (ATS) does not apply extraterritorially in cases alleging violations of international law occurring within the territory of sovereigns outside the United States.
Media Coverage
17 April 2013
Los Angeles Times
Litigation & Dispute Resolution partner Andy Pincus (Washington, DC) is quoted in an article featuring attorney reactions to the US Supreme Court's ruling in Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.
Media Coverage
17 April 2013
Law360
Litigation & Dispute Resolution partner Andy Pincus (Washington, DC) is quoted in an article featuring attorney reactions to the US Supreme Court's ruling in Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.
Media Coverage
17 April 2013
Bloomberg
Litigation & Dispute Resolution partner Andy Pincus (Washington, DC) is quoted on the US Supreme Court ruling in Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.
Media Coverage
17 April 2013
The National Law Journal
Litigation & Dispute Resolution partner Andy Pincus (Washington, DC) is quoted on the US Supreme Court ruling in Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.
Media Coverage
1 April 2013
The New York Times
A brief written by Litigation & Dispute Resolution partners Charles Rothfeld and Andy Pincus and associates Michael Kimberly and Paul Hughes (all Washington, DC) is referenced in an article discussing the Yale Supreme Court Clinic. 
Media Coverage
28 February 2013
Thomson Reuters News & Insight
Washington, DC Litigation & Dispute Resolution partner Andy Pincus is quoted in an article discussing the latest oral arguments in American Express Co v. Italian Colors.
Media Coverage
27 February 2013
The National Law Journal
Litigation & Dispute Resolution partners Josh Yount (Chicago) and Andy Pincus (Washington, DC) are quoted in an article discussing class action litigation in the US Supreme Court.
Media Coverage
26 February 2013
Law360
Washington, DC Litigation & Dispute Resolution partner Andy Pincus is quoted in an article discussing American Express Co.'s bid to force a proposed antitrust class action into arbitration in a case that gives the US Supreme Court a chance to expand on their recent string of pro-arbitration decisions.
Media Coverage
19 February 2013
The Daily Journal (subscription required)
Washington, DC Litigation & Dispute Resolution partner Andy Pincus is quoted in an article discussing how a US Supreme Court case that will decide whether Monsanto Co. has the right to assert its patents after the first sale could have an impact on the software industry.
Media Coverage
13 February 2013
The National Law Journal
Washington, DC Litigation & Dispute Resolution partner Andy Pincus is quoted in an article discussing the arbitration case in the US Supreme Court, American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant.
Media Coverage
29 January 2013
Corporate Counsel
Washington, DC Litigation & Dispute Resolution partner Andy Pincus is quoted on the decision nullifying President Obama’s recess appointments to the NLRB.
Legal Update
29 January 2013
Mayer Brown Legal Update
The recent (January 25) ruling by the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit invalidating President Obama’s recess appointments to the National Labor Relations Board calls into question the validity of every action taken by the NLRB since January 4, 2012.
Media Coverage
28 January 2013
Forbes
Washington, DC Litigation & Dispute Resolution partner Andy Pincus' comments are cited in an article discussing the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit's decision nullifying President Obama’s recess appointments to the National Labor Relations Board.
Media Coverage
28 January 2013
American Banker (subscription required)
Washington, DC Litigation & Dispute Resolution partner Andy Pincus is quoted on how the NLRB ruling might invalidate the recess appointment of Richard Cordray to the CFPB and invalidate the regulations he signed.

The Build a Report feature requires the use of cookies to function properly.  Cookies are small text files that are placed on your computer by websites that you visit. They are widely used in order to make websites work, or work more efficiently.  If you do not accept cookies, this function will not work.  For more information please see our Privacy Policy

You have no pages selected. Please select pages to email then resubmit.