The Pensions Regulator (TPR) has published a market oversight report on market volatility and what trustees should do, which sets out how schemes are responding to the current market environment and highlights risks that trustees need to watch for and respond to.
The report identifies five key areas where trustees of DB schemes should focus:
For trustees of DC schemes, the report identifies three key areas of focus:
Action
Trustees should review the report and factor its recommendations into their risk management processes.
The government has published the final report of its Pensions Investment Review (phase 1 of its review of the UK pensions landscape). The report confirms that the government will proceed with its plans to introduce “megafunds”. However, while the forthcoming Pension Schemes Bill will include a power enabling the government to mandate a minimum level of investment by schemes in certain UK asset classes, in light of the Mansion House Accord, the government does not currently intend to exercise that power. The government does not anticipate exercising the power unless it considers that the industry has not delivered the required change on its own and would only exercise it following a thorough assessment of the potential impacts on members and economic growth. The power will include safeguards to protect members’ interests, and any requirements imposed would be consistent with the principles of fiduciary duty.
Phase 2 of the pensions review will look at retirement adequacy and will be launched “in the coming months”.
For more information, please see our legal update.
Action
No action required.
The Pensions Administration Standards Association (PASA) has published guidance for schemes on connecting to the dashboards ecosystem where they have more than one administrator. Under the dashboards legislation, the duties apply to all benefits from the date a scheme first connects to the ecosystem. Where a scheme has more than one administrator, including AVCs being connected directly by the AVC provider, it will be necessary for all the administrators to connect on the same date for the scheme to comply with the legislation. However, there may be instances where this is not achievable, and the guidance sets out TPR’s approach to such situations as well as a suggested approach for schemes with multiple administrators to take.
In addition, the Pensions Dashboards Programme has published:
Action
No action required, but trustees of schemes with more than one administrator may find the PASA guidance helpful.
PASA has published guidance for administrators on identity management and assurance. The guidance sets out best practices to mitigate identity-related fraud, bolster member protection, and future-proof processes in an increasingly digital landscape.
Action
No action required, but administrators may find the guidance helpful.
HMRC has published research on employer attitudes and behaviours towards salary sacrifice for pension contributions. The research indicates that salary sacrifice was generally seen as beneficial for both employers and employees. Most employers said they did not use the National Insurance (NI) savings from the salary sacrifice arrangement to directly fund their workplace pension.
The research also explores the potential impact of three hypothetical changes to the tax treatment of salary sacrifice for pension contributions:
All three scenarios were viewed negatively, with scenario 2 being the most unpopular. HMRC has not indicated that it plans to change the tax treatment of salary sacrifice for pensions contributions.
Action
No action required.
TPR has launched a new service to help support innovation in members’ interests and potentially boost economic growth. The service aims to reduce unnecessary regulatory barriers to pensions innovation by enabling early transparent discussions between TPR and innovators. TPR will focus on two areas of innovation in particular:
Action
No action required.
TPR has published the final response to its consultation on the form of the written statement of the funding and investment strategy that schemes must submit to TPR. The response confirms the launch of TPR’s new digital service for submission of funding documents, including the statement of strategy. The service will use a dynamic spreadsheet to collect data which is designed to limit the burden on trustees by reducing the amount of data to be provided by some schemes such as low-risk schemes and small schemes.
Action
Trustees of DB schemes whose valuation has an effective date of 22 September 2024 or later should ensure that they use the new digital service to submit their valuation documents. Trustees of schemes whose valuation has an effective date before 22 September 2024 should continue to submit their valuation documents using TPR’s Exchange service.
The government has responded to its 2024 consultation on options in the DB context to provide better outcomes for members, drive a more consolidated market, and enable pension schemes to invest in a diverse portfolio. The response confirms that the government will amend the DB surplus extraction regime by:
The government will not mandate how surplus payments must be used. The Pension Schemes Bill will contain the broad framework for the new regime, with further detail being set out in regulations, on which the government will consult. TPR will also publish guidance on DB surplus extraction.
However, the government will not proceed with introduction of an option to pay a higher Pensions Protection Fund (PPF) levy for 100% PPF compensation. The government will continue to consider the possible role for, and design of, a government consolidator.
For more information, please see our legal update.
Action
No action required.
The government has responded to its consultation on proposals to encourage DC multi-employer trust-based schemes and contract-based workplace pension schemes to consolidate into “megafunds”. The response confirms that the Pension Schemes Bill will contain provisions to:
The requirements will apply to contract-based workplace pension schemes and multi-employer DC trust-based pension schemes that are being used for automatic enrolment. Although the response refers to DC multi-employer trust-based schemes, the inclusion of multiple references to master trusts suggests that the requirements will only apply to DC master trusts and that other types of DC multi-employer schemes will not be within scope. In addition, the requirements will not apply to CDC schemes, hybrid schemes which are only available to a closed group of employers related through their industry or profession, or to default arrangements that serve protected characteristics, such as religion.
The government will also proceed with creation of a contractual override for transfers from contract-based schemes without member consent (but with member protections). However, it will not proceed with its proposals to introduce new employer duties designed to support a shift in focus from cost to value.
For more information, please see our legal update.
Action
Trustees of DC master trusts should consider how the plans will affect them.
In a recent speech, TPR’s Interim Director of Policy and Public Affairs outlined the need for the industry to develop a “sat-nav for retirement” – a dynamic system that guides members in choosing their decumulation options, adjusting for people and where they want to go to. To help the industry develop a suite of products and services which are suitable for different kinds of members, TPR is launching its innovation design services to facilitate and test a range of services with the market. While TPR does not think there is a one-sized-fits-all approach to product design, it believes there are five principles which must be considered:
The speech follows publication of a research report sponsored by TPR which indicates that DC members need more help and guidance to make sure they access the right user-friendly retirement products for their personal circumstances.
Action
No action required.
17 of the UK’s largest workplace pension providers have signed the Mansion House Accord, a voluntary initiative with the aim of securing better financial outcomes for DC members through the higher potential net returns available in private markets, as well as boosting investment in the UK. The Accord builds on, rather than replaces, the Mansion House Compact. Signatories commit, subject to their fiduciary duties and the Financial Conduct Authority’s Consumer Duty, to the ambition of:
Action
No action required.
All our Insights are available here.
Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising associated legal practices that are separate entities, including Mayer Brown LLP (Illinois, USA), Mayer Brown International LLP (England & Wales), Mayer Brown Hong Kong LLP (a Hong Kong limited liability partnership) and Tauil & Chequer Advogados (a Brazilian law partnership) (collectively, the “Mayer Brown Practices”). The Mayer Brown Practices are established in various jurisdictions and may be a legal person or a partnership. PK Wong & Nair LLC (“PKWN”) is the constituent Singapore law practice of our licensed joint law venture in Singapore, Mayer Brown PK Wong & Nair Pte. Ltd. Mayer Brown Hong Kong LLP operates in temporary association with Johnson Stokes & Master (“JSM”). More information about the individual Mayer Brown Practices, PKWN and the association between Mayer Brown Hong Kong LLP and JSM (including how information may be shared) can be found in the Legal Notices section of our website.
“Mayer Brown” and the Mayer Brown logo are trademarks of Mayer Brown.
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.