"She is an incredibly smart subject matter expert who understands there are business decisions to be made."

"She is a good communicator, organized, extremely responsive and combines intelligence with great common sense."

Chambers USA


Ruth Zadikany is a partner in the Los Angeles office of Mayer Brown’s Litigation & Dispute Resolution practice and Co-Leader of Mayer Brown’s US Employment Litigation and Counseling Group. She is an experienced litigator whose practice focuses on representing clients in a broad range of labor and employment-related matters, as well as other high-stakes complex litigation. Ruth has been recognized as a leading employment lawyer by leading publications, including Chambers USA (2021-2022), Legal 500 US (2021) and Benchmark Litigation (2021-2022). In Chambers USA 2022, sources note, “Ruth is very responsive and easy to work with.” In Legal 500 US 2022, clients praise Ruth saying, “she is prominent on a very short list of our most-trusted outside counsel teammates.”

Ruth has extensive experience defending employers in wage-hour class actions and PAGA representative actions involving employee misclassification claims, meal and rest break violations, failure to pay overtime, work-off-the-clock, incorrect pay statements, rounding and expense reimbursement claims, and waiting-time and other penalties, as well as litigation involving wrongful termination, discrimination, harassment and retaliation. Ruth also defends companies in a variety of other types of class and individual actions, such as actions under the Fair Credit Reporting Act and the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.

Ruth represents national and international employers in various industries, including real estate companies, airlines, financial institutions, retailers, telecommunication providers, insurance companies, manufacturers, technology companies, and food industry clients. She works with clients to review and improve their employment practices and policies, and to implement proactive strategies to avoid employment disputes. She regularly counsels and advises clients on day-to-day employment matters, including investigating sexual harassment and discrimination claims, enforcing restrictive covenants, making discipline and termination decisions, reductions in force, and privacy-related issues. Ruth also advises on labor and employment matters in corporate transactions, including drafting language for purchase agreements, assisting with post-acquisition employee integration, and assessing due diligence materials. She also has experience advising employers in labor matters, including with respect to union elections and collective bargaining agreement negotiations. Ruth is a regular contributor to the Employment Round-Up, the firm’s monthly distribution on key developments in the labor and employment area throughout the country.

Prior to joining Mayer Brown, Ruth worked as an attorney in the Labor and Employment practice group of a law firm in Tel Aviv, Israel, where her practice focused on traditional labor and employment litigation, executive compensation, and international transactions, including mergers and acquisitions.


  • Anglais


  • Representing a financial institution in a lawsuit against former employees and their new employer alleging breach of fiduciary duties, breach of contract, and misappropriation of trade secrets arising out of the solicitation of the financial institution’s employees to terminate their employment and theft of company information.
  • Representing a professional services provider and healthcare provider in a wage-and-hour class action alleging failure to provide meal and rest periods, timely wages upon termination and failure to pay overtime.
  • Representing a telecommunications company in a hybrid collective action and class action alleging violations under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), the California Labor Code and the Employment Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) by misclassifying its customer service representatives as exempt rather than non-exempt employees. In response to our motions to dismiss, plaintiff has thus far dismissed a number of her claims for violations of the California Labor Code and all claims alleging violations of ERISA. We also represent our client in a parallel proceeding alleging a representative action for penalties based on the same alleged misclassification under California’s Private Attorneys General Act. We successfully moved to stay the parallel state-court proceeding, to allow resolution of the federal action first.
  • Representing airline in a wage-and-hour class action and PAGA representative action alleging violations of numerous California Labor Code requirements due to the alleged misclassification of pilots as exempt employees, implicating the extraterritorial application of California law.
  • Defended airline in class action and PAGA representative action alleging failure to provide meal and rest periods to flight attendants, implicating the application of California law to employees who work primarily outside the state, as well as wrongful deduction of payroll taxes.
  • Representing defense contractor in misappropriation of confidential information, breach of duty of loyalty and defamation action against former employees in connection with false and misleading statements made to the media in connection with the company’s operations.
  • Defended manufacturing client in wage-hour class action and PAGA representative action alleging failure to provide meal periods, inadequate wage statements, and failure to pay overtime.
  • Defended gig economy company in a number of lawsuits alleging claims that it violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
  • Defended food industry client against claims that it failed to make appropriate disclosures required by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
  • Defended pet store in a nationwide collective action under the Fair Labor Standard Act and a putative class action against claims that it misclassified its employees as exempt.
  • Defended multinational manufacturer of thin film solar panels in putative class action, in which the plaintiff sought to represent a hundreds of former employees alleging violations of the federal and state WARN Acts, as well as other California Labor Code violations.
  • Defended food industry client in wage-and-hour class action filed in California state court. Plaintiffs sought to represent a putative class of several thousand employees and temps, alleging the employer had violated numerous provisions of the Labor Code, including failing to pay employees for donning and doffing personal protective equipment and related activities.
  • Defended multinational manufacturer of medical device in putative wage-and-hour class action filed in the Central District of California, alleging failure to pay overtime based on improper calculation of “regular rate of pay” and meal period violations in contravention of the California Labor Code. Successfully Obtained dismissal of the overtime claims following a motion to dismiss/motion to strike, and later defeated a motion for class certification of remaining meal period claims. The then proceeded to defeat the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment with respect to his individual claims. Successfully moved to dismiss the plaintiff’s appealed in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
  • Defended national manufacturer of medical device components in putative wage and hour class action filed in California state court, alleging violations of California’s labor Code, including meal period, rest period, overtime, failure to reimburse and PAGA claims. Succeeded in defeating the plaintiff’s appeal of the district court’s dismissal of his claims in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
  • Defended false advertising putative class action against multinational manufacturer of solid state storage devices filed in federal court in the Northern District of California. Obtained dismissal of the majority of the financial value of the case by successfully challenging the plaintiff’s standing to assert claims with respect to products that he did not purchase and advertising upon which he did not rely. Reached pre-certification settlement of the putative class representative’s claims for a nominal settlement amount.


UCLA School of Law, JD

University of California, Los Angeles, BA, cum laude
Phi Beta Kappa

Inscription au Barreau


  • Israeli Bar
  • Californie


  • US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
  • US District Court for the Southern District of California
  • US District Court for the Central District of California
  • US District Court for the Northern District of California