Share

Associé

Saqib J. Siddiqui

Intellectual Property, ITC Section 337 Actions, Patent Litigation

Aperçu

Saqib Siddiqui protects clients’ patent rights in district courts, the US International Trade Commission (ITC) and US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Having started his career as an electrical engineer and a patent examiner in the USPTO—drafting and prosecuting over a hundred patent applications while going to law school at night—Saqib unpacks complex technologies and develops litigation strategies that that are centered on predicting the attacks clients’ technical positions will face during litigation and how these attacks will be eventually perceived and countered in front of the jurors and the court. At the earliest juncture, Saqib is already thinking about how the technical aspects of the matter will evolve through trial, which is why clients with complex technical intellectual property assets or products rely on Saqib to manage the technical aspects of their matters.

Expérience

  • Maxell, Ltd. v. Lenovo Group Ltd., and Motorola Mobility (W.D. Tex. 2021) - Represented Maxell in numerous cases over a period of two years involving over ten patents related to features of smartphones, tablets, laptops, and smartwatches. Managed the day-to-day technical aspects of the cases including identifying the patents to be asserted and accused functionalities. The cases resulted in a settlement on the eve of the ITC hearing.
  • Certain Mobile Electronic Devices and Laptop Computers, 337-TA-1324 (ITC) (2022-2023). Represented Maxell in a complex litigation involving five patents related to biometric authentication, cellular dual connectivity, video transfer, and white balance correction.
  • Maxell, Ltd. v. Apple Inc., (E.D. Tex. 2019, W.D. Tex., Germany, and Japan) - Represented Maxell in numerous cases over a period of two years involving over twenty-five patents related to features of smartphones, tablets, laptops, and smartwatches. Managed the day-to-day technical aspects of the cases including identifying the patents to be asserted and accused functionalities. The cases resulted in a settlement on the first day of the first trial.

Formation

  • Georgetown University Law Center, JD
  • University of Houston, BSc, Electrical Engineering

Inscription au Barreau

  • Maryland
  • District of Columbia

Courts

  • US Patent and Trademark Office
  • US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
  • US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Share