I. Introduction
On September 15, 2022, the US Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB” or “Bureau”) issued its long-anticipated report on the Buy Now Pay Later (“BNPL”) industry (the “Report”). The Report describes the state of the BNPL market, including its recent growth, the impacts of BNPL on consumers, and potential legal issues.
The Report is based, in part, on an inquiry the CFPB initiated in December 2021 when it issued a series of orders to collect information from five BNPL companies. The orders were issued pursuant to Section 1022(c)(4) of the Consumer Financial Protection Act, the CFPB’s so-called market monitoring authority.1 This section grants the CFPB the power “to gather information from time to time regarding the organization, business conduct, markets, and activities of covered persons and service providers.”2 Notably, this procedure allows for compulsory process even when the agency does not suspect a particular law violation but, rather, where it simply wants to learn more about an industry.
The orders the CFPB issued to BNPL companies requested voluminous amounts of data and information, including gross merchandise volume data, information about late fees, policies and procedures related to credit underwriting, complaint data, copies of consumer-facing agreements and disclosures, information about credit reporting practices, and data relating to returns.3 In addition to the information submitted to the Bureau in connection with these orders, the CFPB explained that the Report is based on complaints consumers submitted through the Bureau’s consumer complaint database and on feedback the Bureau received in response to a notice and request for comment from the public on experiences with BNPL loans.
The Report makes clear that the CFPB is focused on the BNPL industry. BNPL lenders should expect additional scrutiny and ensure they are complying with applicable law. While Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”) and Regulation Z provisions are not applicable to many BNPL programs because their products require payment of the loan in four or fewer installments, do not involve a finance charge, and do not involve a “credit card” as that term is defined for Regulation Z purposes,4 other legal provisions are implicated by BNPL products including:
As a next step, the CFPB indicated that it will identify potential guidance or rules to issue to ensure that BNPL lenders adhere “to the baseline protections that Congress has already established for credit cards.” The Bureau also stated that it will ensure that BNPL lenders are subject to appropriate supervisory examinations. In his remarks on the Report, Bureau Director Rohit Chopra asked companies that would welcome CFPB examination to self-identify. In addition to asking for volunteers to undergo CFPB examinations, the CFPB has the authority to supervise certain entities that are “larger participants” in markets for consumer financial products or services that it defines by rule.9 The CFPB also may expend enforcement resources to police BNPL lenders’ compliance with applicable law. In short, we can expect the CFPB to be increasingly active in the BNPL space, whether by issuing guidance, rulemaking, supervision, or enforcement.
This Legal Update provides background on the BNPL industry, identifies key trends in the industry, highlights the consumer risks and the legal issues that are implicated by BNPL, and discusses what the Report means for BNPL lenders.10
II. What Is Buy Now Pay Later?
The Report describes BNPL as a form of credit that allows a consumer to split a retail transaction into smaller, interest-free installments and repay over time. While BNPL products can vary, the typical BNPL product that forms the core of the current US BNPL industry divides a purchase into four equal installments, with the first installment paid as a down payment at the time of purchase and the next three installments paid in two-week intervals. According to the CFPB, most BNPL loans range from $50 to $1,000, and although BNPL typically is interest-free, consumers may be charged fees such as late fees. BNPL providers may offer this core product, by itself or alongside other more traditional products intended to finance purchases of goods or services, such as credit card accounts and longer-term installment loans. Additionally, BNPL providers may offer variants to the core BNPL product that, for example, have fewer than four installments or have payment cadences other than biweekly.
The Bureau views BNPL as a close substitute for a credit card, and data from the CFPB’s market monitoring orders indicates that BNPL usage has rapidly increased over the past few years.
III. The CFPB BNPL Report
We highlight some of the key findings from the Report below.
a. Key Industry Trends
The Report highlights that the five BNPL lenders surveyed originated $24.2 billion in loans in 2021, which was nearly triple the amount originated in 2020 ($8.3 billion) and more than 12 times the amount originated in 2019 ($2 billion).11 The apparel and beauty industries made up 58.6 percent of originations in 2021, while BNPL usage for “everyday” or “necessity” purchases (gas, groceries, and utilities) was $229.2 million in 2021, up 434 percent from $42.9 million in 2020 and 1,207 percent from $3.3 million in 2019.12
The Report also notes that 73 percent of applicants were approved for credit in 2021, up from 69 percent in 2020. Approximately 89 percent of loan repayments were made on a debit card in 2021, which is consistent from the previous two years of data collection.13 Approximately 10 percent of borrowers were charged at least one late fee in 2021, and late fees accounted for 6.9 percent of revenues in 2021 (up from 4.8 percent in 2020).14 Nearly 14 percent of individual loans in 2021 involved a purchase that was returned or disputed, up from 12.2 percent in 2020, and 3.8 percent of borrowers had a loan that was charged off in 2021, up from 2.9 percent in 2020.15
b. CFPB Focus
The Report identifies what it calls the two most popular BNPL customer-acquisition strategies. The first, the merchant-partner acquisition model, is the method that the majority of BNPL providers use, in which providers sign contracts with specific online retailers to embed their product on the retailers’ checkout pages. Consumers shopping on those retailers’ websites and apps see the option to use BNPL and may choose to split their purchase into four equal, interest-free installments.16 The second, called the “app-driven acquisition model,” is the method to which some BNPL providers are shifting.17 In the app-driven acquisition model, consumers complete the credit application process with the BNPL provider in the provider’s proprietary app. Once approved, consumers receive access to a virtual shopping mall of merchants to shop at within the app. This method often entails a single-use, bank-issued virtual card associated with a major card network that an approved applicant uses to complete a purchase and a consummate an individual BNPL loan, which allows nearly any merchant who engages in ecommerce to accept BNPL—even if the merchant has not signed a specific contract with the BNPL lender. It also allows BNPL providers to share in a portion of the interchange fees that are collected from the virtual card transaction.18 The Report states that the app-driven model strengthens the consumer’s relationship with the BNPL provider “by driving the consumer to begin (and often end) their purchase journey within the lender’s ‘self-contained app ecosystem.’”19
c. Consumer Risks and Legal Issues
The Report highlights consumer risks in three categories: discrete consumer harms, data harvesting, and overextension.
With respect to discrete consumer harms, the Report identifies:
Data Harvesting: The Report identifies the harvesting and monetizing of consumer data in the “payments and lending ecosystems” generally as a possible threat to “consumers’ privacy, security, and autonomy.” It highlights concerns of consolidation of market power with few large tech platforms that will reduce competition.26 With respect to the BNPL industry in particular, the Report describes the kind of data collected by BNPL providers and notes that the collection and use of data may increase with the shift to the app-driven customer acquisition model.
Overextension: The Report also pinpoints concerns with consumers potentially overextending as a result of using BNPL products. The Report identifies two types of possible overextension: loan stacking (where a borrower takes out multiple BNPL loans from different BNPL providers at the same time) and sustained usage (which results from habitual use of BNPL and might lead to defaulting on other credit obligations).27
d. CFPB Next Steps
The Report and accompanying statements by Director Chopra identify several likely actions forthcoming from the CFPB:
IV. What Does This Mean for My Business?
For any company in, or investing in, the rapidly growing BNPL industry, the CFPB Report and Director Chopra’s comments indicate that the CFPB is paying close attention.
The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) is also paying attention to the BNPL industry. Shortly after the CFPB published its report on the industry, the FTC released a blog post that lists three principles that it suggests BNPL companies keep in mind:
Companies in this space should take note and consider their business practices in light of the issues discussed above.
***
Note: Two of our authors have particular knowledge of how the CFPB and FTC approach issues such as those emerging with BNPL: Ori Lev served as a CFPB deputy enforcement director, and Christopher Leach was an attorney in the FTC’s Division of Financial Practices.
3 Last fall, the CFPB issued similar orders to six tech companies that operate payment services. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, “CFPB Orders Tech Giants to Turn Over Information on their Payment System Plans” (Oct. 21, 2021), available at: https://www.consumerfinance.gov/about-us/newsroom/cfpb-orders-tech-giants-to-turn-over-information-on-their-payment-system-plans/.
4 15 U.S.C. § 1602(g); 12 C.F.R. § 1026.2(17).
7 15 U.S.C. §§ 1681, et seq.; 12 C.F.R. Part 1022.
8 15 U.S.C. §§ 6801, et seq.; 12 C.F.R. Part 1016.
9 12 U.S.C. § 5514(a)(1)(B). The Bureau also has the authority to supervise certain entities that it has reasonable cause to determine are engaging, or have engaged, in conduct that poses risks to consumers with regard to the offering or provision of consumer financial products or services. Id. § 5514(a)(1)(C). The Bureau may base this determination on complaints collected through the Bureau’s complaints portal or information from other sources. In addition, the Bureau must give the covered person at issue a reasonable opportunity to respond to this determination.
10 For more on the fast-growing BNPL industry, listen to Mayer Brown’s half-hour webcast on “Emerging Issues in the Buy Now, Pay Later Industry,” available at: https://www.mayerbrown.com/en/perspectives-events/events/2021/09/emerging-issues-in-the-buy-now-pay-later-industry.
11 Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, “Buy Now, Pay Later: Market Trends and Consumer Impacts” (Sept. 15, 2022), available at: https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_buy-now-pay-later-market-trends-consumer-impacts_report_2022-09.pdf, p. 3 (hereinafter “Report”).
Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising associated legal practices that are separate entities, including Mayer Brown LLP (Illinois, USA), Mayer Brown International LLP (England & Wales), Mayer Brown Hong Kong LLP (a Hong Kong limited liability partnership) and Tauil & Chequer Advogados (a Brazilian law partnership) (collectively, the “Mayer Brown Practices”). The Mayer Brown Practices are established in various jurisdictions and may be a legal person or a partnership. PK Wong & Nair LLC (“PKWN”) is the constituent Singapore law practice of our licensed joint law venture in Singapore, Mayer Brown PK Wong & Nair Pte. Ltd. Mayer Brown Hong Kong LLP operates in temporary association with Johnson Stokes & Master (“JSM”). More information about the individual Mayer Brown Practices, PKWN and the association between Mayer Brown Hong Kong LLP and JSM (including how information may be shared) can be found in the Legal Notices section of our website.
“Mayer Brown” and the Mayer Brown logo are trademarks of Mayer Brown.
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.