Skip to main content


Preserving Insufficiency: Tips for Avoiding Forfeiture of Sufficiency of the Evidence Arguments Under Rule 50

May 2009
Mayer Brown Article
This past fall, in Maher v. City of Chicago, 547 F.3d 817, 824 (7th Cir. 2008), the Seventh Circuit ruled that a challenge to a jury verdict was “doom[ed]” because the appealing plaintiff did not file a motion for judgment as a matter of law under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50.
The Build a Report feature requires the use of cookies to function properly. Cookies are small text files that are placed on your computer by websites that you visit. They are widely used in order to make websites work, or work more efficiently. If you do not accept cookies, this function will not work. For more information please see our Privacy Policy

You have no pages selected. Please select pages to email then resubmit.