Skip to main content


From Japan Line to Barclays: The Rise and Fall of the Foreign Commerce Clause

7 State Tax Notes 379
The Supreme Court's recent decision in Barclays Bank PLC v. Franchise Tax Board, which
upheld the constitutionality of California's worldwide combined reporting method of
apportionment, had some unusual features for a case involving the arcana of state taxation. The
enormous amount of money involved -- estimates of California's potential refund liability ran
(somewhat improbably) as high as $4 billion -- guaranteed wide attention for the case in the press.
The Build a Report feature requires the use of cookies to function properly. Cookies are small text files that are placed on your computer by websites that you visit. They are widely used in order to make websites work, or work more efficiently. If you do not accept cookies, this function will not work. For more information please see our Privacy Policy

You have no pages selected. Please select pages to email then resubmit.