Meytal McCoy is counsel in the Litigation & Dispute Resolution practice in Mayer Brown’s Washington DC office. She focuses her practice on antitrust merger clearance, business counseling and representation of parties before the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Antitrust Division of the US Department of Justice (DOJ).
Her experience spans a variety of industries, including food, energy, restaurant, agricultural, technology, financial services, pharmaceutical and healthcare/medical device. Meytal manages all phases of the US and foreign merger clearance process, including guiding clients during the due diligence and information exchange process, advising on antitrust risk sharing contract provisions, conducting merger control filing analyses and working with local counsel to ensure that merger control is handled in an efficient, cost-effective and commercially reasonable way. Her practice also encompasses all phases of US and foreign merger clearance, including pre-merger business counseling and representation before US and foreign agencies in merger investigations. Meytal also has significant experience with electronic discovery, including e-discovery practice before the FTC and DOJ and e-discovery in civil litigation.
Meytal is a founding member of the Mayer Brown DC Lateral Associates Committee and the DC Mayer Brown Attorney Parent Resource Group, and she actively participates as a mentor for junior associates. Meytal also regularly participates in activities with the ABA Antitrust Section, where she frequently edits chapters of ABA antitrust publications, including Antitrust Law Developments.
Mergers Counseling and Investigations: Counsels clients regarding merger control filings and pre-merger issues (gun jumping). Has extensive experience coordinating US (HSR) and foreign merger control filings. Represents clients before the FTC and DOJ in merger investigations and “Second Requests.”
Antitrust and Business Counseling: Regularly counsels clients regarding deal structure, antitrust risk, antitrust compliance and Clayton Act Section 8 (interlocking directorates). Represents clients before the FTC and DOJ regarding antitrust business matters.
Electronic Discovery: Counsels clients regarding e-discovery issues, including litigation holds, document collection, and e-discovery pricing. Has particular experience with e-discovery before the FTC and DOJ.
- Represented Nestlé S.A. in $2.3 billion global acquisition of Atrium Innovations.
- Represented Nestlé S.A. in $2.8 billion sale of U.S. confectionary business to Ferrero Group.
- Represented public utility in $8 billion acquisition to another utility.
- Represented health insurance company in $1.2 billion acquisition of Medicaid and Medicare focused managed care company
- Represented of global specialty products company in $1.3 billion acquisition of leading global manufacturer of water and air filtration and purification solutions
- Represented of financial institution in $2 billion sale of loan business in a non-reportable merger investigation before the U.S. Department of Justice, which was cleared without remedy
- Represented Virgin America in its $2.6 billion acquisition by Alaska Airlines, including managing merger investigation.
- Represented consumer food products company in $545M acquisition of pet food company
- Represented software company in $660 million acquisition of online financial services platform.
- Represented major international phosphate producer in $1.4 billion acquisition before the DOJ
- Represented packaging company in $2 billion acquisition before the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice.
- Representation of third party health insurance company in variety of state and federal litigations relating allegedly anticompetitive contracting and other practices by dominant medical provider group.
- United States v. AB Electrolux, et al. Represented third party in highly contentious merger litigation, including advocating for client regarding protective order, defending client in depositions, and preparing client witness for trial.
- American Specialty Health v. Healthways Inc. Represented ASH in action alleging that competitor monopolized Medicare Advantage fitness plans through exclusive contracts with fitness facilities in violation of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act and California consumer protection statutes. Litigation settled favorably with defendant agreeing to waive the challenged provisions in contracts with certain facilities.
American University, JD, cum laude
Articles Editor, American University International Law Review
The George Washington University, BA, cum laude
- US District Court for the District of Columbia