Many US and other non-EU financial institutions which lend or undertake trade finance business on a cross border basis into Europe do so in reliance upon exemptions under local law. These exemptions typically permit these non-EU entities to undertake such business without the need to obtain authorisation or licence from the local regulator (the “national competent authority”) and/or maintain a branch or subsidiary in the relevant EU member state.
CRD6 came into force on 9 July 2024 with staggered implementation. It will impose a new licencing regime for “core banking activities”, the full provisions of which will need to be transposed into national law and come into effect on 11 January 2027. This new regime will have extraterritorial effect and, subject to certain limited exemptions, will require non-EU financial institutions (e.g. US and Asian banks) providing core banking activities to establish branches in the EU and obtain authorisation from the relevant national competent authority. This harmonisation of rules across the EU under CRD6 will mean that existing exemptions for commercial lending and trade finance activities in individual EU member states will to a large extent be replaced with the new EU-wide licencing regime.
Non-EU institutions which are required to establish branches will be subject to capital, liquidity and other prudential requirements. Non-EU financial institutions with existing branches in the EU may opt to convert these into subsidiaries in order to provide core banking activities cross border into other member states using the CRD passport.
Unless an exemption applies, under Article 21c (see also Article 47(1)) of CRD6, in-scope non-EU financial institutions will be required to seek authorisation and establish a branch in the relevant EU member state before commencing or continuing “core banking activities”. National competent authorities will also have powers to require the establishment of a subsidiary instead of a branch.
Core banking activities are defined to include:
*There remains ambiguity as to how taking deposits and other repayable funds will be interpreted under the local laws of individual members states, e.g. whether this would include custody services or the issuance of capital markets instruments (each of which currently benefit from exemptions in certain member states).
The new licencing regime applies to non-EU entities which would meet the criteria for “credit institutions” under the EU Capital Requirements Regulation (“CRR”) if they were an EU entity (this definition will also include systemic large investment firms which are not banks).
Credit institutions are defined under CRR as a business which consists of any of the following:
The above thresholds do not apply to the business of taking deposits and other repayable funds, which are caught irrespective of the size of the credit institution. The legal interpretation amongst EU member states of taking deposits and other repayable funds will be a key area of consideration for financial institutions falling within scope who issue debt securities and currently rely on national law exemptions for this activity.
Credit institutions falling within scope will exclude any entities which fall into the following categories:
However, for all other core banking activities, it is clear that the rules are targeted at large banks (>EUR30 bn) and will exclude non-EU funds and non-EU insurance and reinsurance companies lending into the EU.
The requirement to establish a branch in the relevant EU member state will not apply in the following circumstances:
There is no clarity in CRD6 on when activities will be treated as being performed “in” an EU member state. As such, in the absence of further guidance from the European Banking Authority, this may lead to a fragmentation of approach amongst the member state. For example, where a US bank lends to a borrower incorporated in Spain and undertakes all of the lending activity in the US with no travel to Spain, does the core banking activity take place in a member state?
CRD6 came into force in July 2024, but a staggered approach will be taken to the implementation of the third country branch requirements. A list of some of the key dates are included below:
Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising associated legal practices that are separate entities, including Mayer Brown LLP (Illinois, USA), Mayer Brown International LLP (England & Wales), Mayer Brown Hong Kong LLP (a Hong Kong limited liability partnership) and Tauil & Chequer Advogados (a Brazilian law partnership) (collectively, the “Mayer Brown Practices”). The Mayer Brown Practices are established in various jurisdictions and may be a legal person or a partnership. PK Wong & Nair LLC (“PKWN”) is the constituent Singapore law practice of our licensed joint law venture in Singapore, Mayer Brown PK Wong & Nair Pte. Ltd. Mayer Brown Hong Kong LLP operates in temporary association with Johnson Stokes & Master (“JSM”). More information about the individual Mayer Brown Practices, PKWN and the association between Mayer Brown Hong Kong LLP and JSM (including how information may be shared) can be found in the Legal Notices section of our website.
“Mayer Brown” and the Mayer Brown logo are trademarks of Mayer Brown.
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.