Skip to main content

Past Event
1 July 2008


  • Evan M. Tager
    T +1 202 263 3240
  • Lauren R. Goldman
    T +1 212 506 2647

Exxon v Baker - What Does This Mean for Business?

Exxon v Baker - What Does This Mean for Business?

Tuesday, July 01, 2008

The Supreme Court released its opinion in Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker, No. 07-219, the landmark Exxon Valdez case, holding that the $2.5 billion punitive damages award is excessive as a matter of maritime law and that "a 1:1 ratio" of punitive to compensatory damages " is a fair upper limit" in maritime cases. What are the implications of this decision for due process challenges to punitive damages awards in the future? Evan Tager and Lauren Goldman, partners in Mayer Brown's Supreme Court & Appellate group with vast experience in punitive damages litigation, discussed the Exxon decision and its ramifications for future punitive damages cases during this webinar presentation. The discussion focused on:

  • Will the Court's adoption of a presumptive 1:1 limit spill over into cases asserting that punitive awards are unconstitutionally excessive?
  • How broad are the exceptions to the 1:1 presumption identified in the Court's opinion?
  • Does the Court's opinion create a safe harbor for large punitive awards that are at or less than the amount of compensatory damages?


Lauren Goldman
Evan Tager

Related Materials:

Presentation Slides
Presentation Audio
Opinion - Exxon v. Baker

Related Multimedia

The Build a Report feature requires the use of cookies to function properly. Cookies are small text files that are placed on your computer by websites that you visit. They are widely used in order to make websites work, or work more efficiently. If you do not accept cookies, this function will not work. For more information please see our Privacy Policy

You have no pages selected. Please select pages to email then resubmit.