In what The AmLaw Daily described as a “blockbuster” ruling, the Supreme Court recently held in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion that the Federal Arbitration Act preempts state law from categorically mandating the use of class-action procedures as a condition of enforcing arbitration agreements. Central to the Court’s analysis in Concepcion was its discussion of the features of the AT&T arbitration provision at issue, which “provide[s] incentive for the individual prosecution of meritorious claims.”
The Court’s decision in Concepcion is unquestionably a significant development for businesses that have included, or intend to include, arbitration provisions in their consumer and employee agreements. Yet the reach of Concepcion’s holding remains an open question.
Please join Andrew Pincus, Evan Tager, and Archis Parasharami, all of whom represented AT&T Mobility before the Supreme Court in Concepcion, as they discuss
- What the Supreme Court’s opinion in Concepcion means for businesses and their consumers and employees
- Key considerations in drafting arbitration agreements in view of Concepcion
- The next wave of arguments the plaintiffs’ bar may raise to challenge the use of arbitration agreements that preclude class procedures
Archis A. Parasharami
Andrew J. Pincus
Evan M. Tager
7:30 p.m. – 8:30 p.m. CEST
6:30 p.m. – 7:30 p.m. BST
1:30 p.m. – 2:30 p.m. EDT
12:30 p.m. – 1:30 p.m. CDT
11:30 a.m. – 12:30 p.m. MDT
10:30 a.m. – 11:30 a.m. PDT
CLE credit is pending.
Instructions for accessing the program will be sent prior to the event.
For additional information, please contact Somer McBride at +1 202 263 3015 or