On 17 February 2023, the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) published new regulations relating to overseas offerings and listing by PRC companies. The new regulations authorise the CSRC to accept and review the filings of applications for overseas offerings and listings to ensure they are in line with Chinese regulations and policy. Under the new system, PRC companies can choose any overseas listing venue but are required to make certain filings with the CSRC and complete a review process. The CSRC will retain the authority to accept or reject the filings of any overseas offering and listing application after a review process. The new regulations take effect on 31 March 2023.
The new regulations largely follow the draft regulations that have been circulating in the market for over a year with adoption delayed in part due to the pandemic response. During this time, market participants have had adequate time to prepare for adoption. Market commentators have speculated that such new regulations could streamline overseas listings by centralising the approval mechanism and offering greater certainty regarding PRC approvals while others have expressed concern about potential timing delays. The CSRC’s timing provisions below should give comfort on the timing issue. Of course, implementation efficiency and how the standards are applied will be important to monitor as market participants and potential overseas listing candidates encounter the new regulations.
The newly released set of regulations consists of six documents, including the Trial Administrative Measures of Overseas Securities Offering and Listing by Domestic Companies (境内企业境外发行证券和上市管理试行办法) (the “Trial Measures”) and five supporting guidelines. Key aspects of the Trial Measures are set out below.
1. Direct and Indirect Overseas Listings of Securities by PRC Issuers
The Trial Measures regulate both (a) direct overseas offerings and listings by domestic PRC companies and (b) indirect overseas offering and listing by a foreign company with major business operations and/or assets located in the PRC.
An indirect offering and listing is determined by set of quantifiable standards. For example, any overseas offering and listing by an issuer that meets both of the following standards will be deemed to be indirect:
The Trial Measures indicate that the determination as to whether or not an overseas offering and listing by domestic PRC companies is indirect, shall be made on a substance over form basis.
2. Securities Subject to the New Rules
The securities subject to the Trial Measures include equity shares, depository receipts, corporate bonds convertible to equity shares, and other equity securities.
3. Security Review
PRC companies in certain business sectors are required to undergo national security review or obtain clearance from relevant authorities if necessary before making any filings with the CSRC. Also, PRC companies must comply with national secrecy and data security laws with respect to any data disclosure. In addition, the CSRC has the authority to and may block offshore listings that: (1) are explicitly prohibited by laws; (2) may endanger national security; (3) involve criminal offenses such as corruption, bribery, embezzlement, misappropriation of property by the issuer, its controlling persons (with a three-year lookback); (4) involve the issuer under investigations for suspicion of criminal offenses or major violations of laws and regulations; or (5) involve material ownership disputes.
4. Filing and Review Timelines
The filing and review timeline for CSRC filings for the various scenarios addressed by the rules is summarised below.
5. Issuer Filing Requirements
The CSRC filing requirements for the various scenarios are summarised below.
6. VIE Structures
The Trial Measures grant the CSRC the authority to regulate the overseas offering and listing of PRC companies with variable interest entity (VIE) structures and allow filings by VIE-structured companies insofar as they comply with the relevant regulations. Numerous regulators in China regulate VIEs and the CSRC will be another regulator added to the mix. In practice, issuers should consult with other relevant authorities in respect of its VIE structure before filing with the CSRC.
7. Consequences of Non-compliance
Non-compliance with the new rules could result in regulatory action by the CSRC and fines for PRC issuers, controlling shareholders and persons and underwriters. Fines could be up to RMB 10 million (approximately US$1.5 million).
8. Effective Date and Transition
The new rules are effective on 31 March 2023.
PRC companies that are already listed on overseas exchanges by or before 31 March 2023 are not required to make any filings with CSRC unless they raise additional equity financing.
A six-month compliance transition will be given to PRC companies that have obtained the approval of overseas regulators or exchanges since implementation date of the new regulations but have not completed the indirect overseas listing.
The documentation requirements under the new CSRC filing regime are similar to those of the previous application process for direct overseas offerings and listings by domestic PRC companies (H share listing), except for the addition of national secrecy and data security review. The new CSRC filing regime does streamline both the direct and indirect overseas listings of securities by PRC issuers and clear up certain uncertainties facing by the PRC issuers and professionals involved. Regulators have indicated that they intend to provide a streamlined process to minimise delays, but it is hard to see how these additional layers of on-shore regulatory review and compliance burden will not impact the overall deal timeline. Although it remains to see how this will play out in practice, these new rules represent an encouraging step in the right direction for development of the capital markets for PRC issuers.
No More Class Meetings for Hong Kong Listed PRC Issuers in Repurchasing or Issuing Shares
Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising associated legal practices that are separate entities, including Mayer Brown LLP (Illinois, USA), Mayer Brown International LLP (England & Wales), Mayer Brown Hong Kong LLP (a Hong Kong limited liability partnership) and Tauil & Chequer Advogados (a Brazilian law partnership) (collectively, the “Mayer Brown Practices”). The Mayer Brown Practices are established in various jurisdictions and may be a legal person or a partnership. PK Wong & Nair LLC (“PKWN”) is the constituent Singapore law practice of our licensed joint law venture in Singapore, Mayer Brown PK Wong & Nair Pte. Ltd. Mayer Brown Hong Kong LLP operates in temporary association with Johnson Stokes & Master (“JSM”). More information about the individual Mayer Brown Practices, PKWN and the association between Mayer Brown Hong Kong LLP and JSM (including how information may be shared) can be found in the Legal Notices section of our website.
“Mayer Brown” and the Mayer Brown logo are trademarks of Mayer Brown.
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.