Skip to main content

  • AddRemove
  • Build a Report 
Legal Update

Using the Congressional Review Act to Invalidate or Repeal Informal Agency Guidance

8 January 2018
Mayer Brown Legal Update

Last month, the US Government Accountability Office (“GAO”) released a letter stating that a Consumer Financial Protection Bureau bulletin discussing indirect auto lending and compliance with the Equal Credit Opportunity Act qualifies as a “rule” for purposes of the Congressional Review Act (“CRA”). The GAO’s December letter is similar to a letter the GAO released in October 2017 stating that guidance on leveraged lending issued jointly by three banking regulators is a rule for purposes of the CRA.

The GAO’s interpretation provides an avenue for Congress to use the CRA to invalidate or repeal informal agency guidance that does not rise to the level of a regulation adopted through notice-and-comment rulemaking. Some in Congress seem to intend to do just that. This Legal Update discusses the mechanics and use of the CRA, the CRA’s definition of a “rule” and the implications of applying the CRA to interpretive rules and policy statements.

Authors

  • Melanie Brody
    T +1 202 263 3304
  • Laurence E. Platt
    T +1 202 263 3407
  • Christa L. Bieker
    T +1 202 263 3438
The Build a Report feature requires the use of cookies to function properly. Cookies are small text files that are placed on your computer by websites that you visit. They are widely used in order to make websites work, or work more efficiently. If you do not accept cookies, this function will not work. For more information please see our Privacy Policy

You have no pages selected. Please select pages to email then resubmit.