Skip to main content

Legal Update

Trump Administration Issues New Travel Ban

25 September 2017
Mayer Brown Legal Update

On Sunday, September 24, 2017, US President Donald Trump issued a “Presidential Proclamation Enhancing Vetting Capabilities and Processes for Detecting Attempted Entry Into the United States by Terrorists or Other Public-Safety Threats.” The proclamation imposes nationality-based travel restrictions as a result of the worldwide review conducted by the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Director of National Security, pursuant to Section 2(b) of Executive Order (“EO”) 13780. The new country-specific restrictions will affect travel to the United States by nationals of Chad, Iran, Libya, North Korea, Somalia, Syria, Venezuela, and Yemen. Sudan, which had been included in the first two “travel ban” executive orders, has been removed from the list.

Country-Specific Restrictions

Unlike the two “travel ban” executive orders (EO 13769 and EO 13780), the presidential proclamation issued on Sunday is intended to be “tailored, as appropriate, given the unique conditions in and deficiencies of each country, as well as other country-specific considerations.” The country-specific restrictions are as follows:




Entry into the United States as immigrants and as business visitors (B-1) or tourists (B-2) is suspended indefinitely.


Entry into the United States as immigrants and as nonimmigrants is suspended indefinitely, except for students (F and M) and exchange visitors (J). Student and exchange visitors will be subject to enhanced screening and vetting requirements.


Entry into the United States as immigrants and as business visitors (B-1) or tourists (B-2) is suspended indefinitely.

North Korea

Entry into the United States as immigrants and as nonimmigrants is suspended indefinitely.


Entry into the United States as immigrants is suspended indefinitely. Nonimmigrants will be subject to enhanced screening and vetting requirements.


Entry into the United States as immigrants and as nonimmigrants is suspended indefinitely.


Entry into the United States of certain Venezuelan government officials and their immediate family members as business visitors (B-1) or tourists (B-2) is suspended indefinitely.


Entry into the United States as immigrants and as business visitors (B-1) or tourists (B-2) is suspended indefinitely.


Who Is Not Affected?

The ban applies only to individuals who do not have a valid visa on the effective date of the proclamation. According to a fact sheet published by the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”), the new travel ban does not apply to:

  1. any lawful permanent resident of the United States;
  2. any foreign national who is admitted to or paroled into the United States on or after the effective date of this proclamation;
  3. any foreign national who has a document valid on the effective date of this proclamation or issued on any date thereafter that permits him or her to travel to the United States and seek entry or admission, such as an advance parole document;
  4. any dual national of a country designated under Section 2 of this proclamation when the individual is traveling on a passport issued by a non-designated country;
  5. any foreign national traveling on a diplomatic or diplomatic-type visa, North Atlantic Treaty Organization visa, C-2 visa for travel to the United Nations, or G-1, G-2, G-3, or G-4 visa; or
  6. any foreign national who has been granted asylum; any refugee who has already been admitted to the United States; or any individual who has been granted withholding of removal, advance parole, or protection under the Convention Against Torture.

Note that while Iraqi nationals are not included in the ban, the Secretary of Homeland Security recommends additional scrutiny of applicants from Iraq to determine if they pose risks to the national security or public safety of the United States.

Effective Dates

The restrictions contained in the proclamation took effect on Sunday, September 24, 2017, for those foreign nationals who were subject to the suspension of entry under Section 2 of EO 13780 and who lack a credible claim of a “bona fide relationship” with a person or entity of the United States. In ruling that the travel ban embodied in EO 13780 could proceed, the Supreme Court carved out an exception for those foreign nationals with such a credible claim. In response to a Trump administration effort to limit the qualifying relationships, the Supreme Court allowed to stand a decision by the Federal District Court in Hawaii that the Trump administration must exempt from the travel ban “grandparents, grandchildren, brothers-in-law, sisters-in-law, aunts, uncles, nieces, nephews and cousins of persons in the United States” as well as immediate family members.

For all other foreign nationals subject to the suspension of entry under Section 2 of EO 13780, and for nationals of Chad, North Korea, and Venezuela, the restrictions and limitations contained in the proclamation will take effect on October 18, 2017.

Supreme Court Review

In light of the new proclamation, the Supreme Court issued an order, dated September 25, 2017, asking the parties in Trump v. International Refugee Assistance, et al. and Trump v. Hawaii, et al. to submit letter briefs addressing whether, or to what extent, the expiration of EO 13780 may render the cases moot. The briefs are due by Thursday, October 5, 2017. The cases, which had been scheduled for argument on October 10, 2017, have been removed from the oral argument calendar, pending further order of the court.

Other Travel-Related Considerations

Enhanced vetting of visitors and immigrants to the United States is only one approach the administration is taking to protect against the entry of terrorists and other threats to national security. As we reported earlier this year, DHS, and in particular, Customs and Border Protection, is increasingly enforcing its longstanding ability to examine “virtual briefcases”—including, but not limited to, electronic data contained on personal devices such as mobile phones, laptop computers, and tablets at ports of entry. In many instances, officers may request personal identification numbers (“PINs”) and passwords to electronic files and social media. During the inspection process, travelers are subject to an examination to determine their admissibility into the United States and an examination of their belongings for evidence of contraband or criminal activity. Federal law permits the search to be conducted without a warrant and without suspicion.

The repercussions of such searches continue to increase in an era when nearly every traveler possesses an electronic device connected to, among other services, email and social media, and politicians and advocates have raised concern regarding the ease with which such materials can be inspected. Absent compelling circumstances, we recommend cooperation with DHS. Failure to cooperate may result in delays in the inspection process and/or detention of the device(s). We also recommend employers ask employees to report to the employer if they have provided DHS officers access to privileged or business-sensitive data.


  • Elizabeth (Liz) Espín Stern
    T +1 202 263 3825
  • Paul Virtue
    T +1 202 263 3875
  • Grace Shie
    T +1 202 263 3845
The Build a Report feature requires the use of cookies to function properly. Cookies are small text files that are placed on your computer by websites that you visit. They are widely used in order to make websites work, or work more efficiently. If you do not accept cookies, this function will not work. For more information please see our Privacy Policy

You have no pages selected. Please select pages to email then resubmit.