Skip to main content


Can Plaintiffs Dodge Concepcion By Arguing That They Need Class Actions To Vindicate Federal Statutory Claims?

17 September 2012
Mayer Brown's Class Defense Blog

Since Concepcion, the plaintiffs’ bar has been searching for ways to avoid agreements to arbitrate on an individual basis. Because their efforts have largely failed so far, the new frontrunner is the argument that class procedures are necessary to permit “vindication of federal statutory rights.” Most courts to consider the argument have rejected it, but it has gained some real traction in the Second Circuit, which refused to enforce American Express’s arbitration agreement in the context of federal antitrust claims by a group of merchants. After the Second Circuit denied en banc review by a sharply divided vote, American Express filed a petition for certiorari (pdf). The case in the Supreme Court is captioned American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant, No. 12-133.

Read the entire post on Mayer Brown's Class Defense Blog.

The Build a Report feature requires the use of cookies to function properly. Cookies are small text files that are placed on your computer by websites that you visit. They are widely used in order to make websites work, or work more efficiently. If you do not accept cookies, this function will not work. For more information please see our Privacy Policy

You have no pages selected. Please select pages to email then resubmit.