Skip to main content

  • AddRemove
  • Build a Report 
Legal Update

California Employers 'Provide' Meal Periods by Making Them Available but Need Not Ensure That Employees Take Them

18 April 2012
Mayer Brown Legal Update
In Brinker Restaurant Corp., et al. v. Superior Court of San Diego County (Hohbaum, et al.), the California Supreme Court ruled that employers satisfy their obligation under California law to “provide” duty free meal periods by making them available, but need not ensure that employees actually take the meal periods. This decision, which is a significant victory for employers, will be of interest to all businesses with California employees. In addition, the court clarified an important issue of class certification law that had divided the lower courts, holding that a court considering a motion to certify a class must resolve disputed legal or factual issues that were necessary to determine whether common issues predominated over individualized ones.

Authors

  • John Nadolenco
    T +1 213 229 5173
  • Bronwyn F. Pollock
    T +1 213 229 5194
  • John Zaimes
    T +1 213 229 9545
  • Donald M. Falk
    T +1 650 331 2030

The Build a Report feature requires the use of cookies to function properly.  Cookies are small text files that are placed on your computer by websites that you visit. They are widely used in order to make websites work, or work more efficiently.  If you do not accept cookies, this function will not work.  For more information please see our Privacy Policy

You have no pages selected. Please select pages to email then resubmit.