﻿<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="rss.xsl.aspx?id=857"?>
<rss xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Pickford, Stuart</title>
    <link>http://www.mayerbrown.com/</link>
    <description />
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright />
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 16:49:17 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <category>News</category>
      <description>Article reports on the Court of Appeal’s ruling in the £400m Northern Rock appeal case, a victory for London Litigation partner Stuart Pickford who acted for the Independent Valuer of Northern Rock.</description>
      <link>http://www.mayerbrown.com/news/detail.aspx?news=3065</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f217877b-7e48-42bd-a25d-d64323f243ae</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 12:39:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>CoA throws out £400m Northern Rock appeal</title>
    </item>
    <item>
      <category>News</category>
      <description>Bylined article by London Commercial Dispute Resolution&amp;nbsp;partner Stuart Pickford and&amp;nbsp;associate Jonathan Cohen look at a recent shipping dispute before the UK Commercial Court and consider pertinent questions in the doctrine of economic duress.&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;This article was first published in CDR, 7 June 2012.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.mayerbrown.com/news/detail.aspx?news=2467</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ec83faf6-4816-49cc-9012-156544abd9e4</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 13:29:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Economic duress: driving a hard bargain or illegitimate pressure?</title>
    </item>
    <item>
      <category>News</category>
      <description>London Commercial Dispute Resolution partner Stuart Pickford is quoted in an article about the Supreme Court judgment in the Pitt and Futter v HMRC case.</description>
      <link>http://www.mayerbrown.com/news/detail.aspx?news=3078</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">99826051-81ad-48fe-bada-a7e1104c2263</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 14:45:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Supreme Court rules on Pitt and Futter v HMRC cases</title>
    </item>
    <item>
      <category>Publication</category>
      <description>In a judgment delivered on 23 January 2013, the UK Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Court of Appeal, that legal advice privilege (“&lt;strong&gt;LAP&lt;/strong&gt;”) should not be extended to cover legal advice provided by accountants.</description>
      <link>http://www.mayerbrown.com/publications/detail.aspx?publication=8772</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ac875c86-1a4d-422f-970e-47350ad868cc</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 18:15:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>UK Supreme Court declines to extend scope of legal advice privilege</title>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>