﻿<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="rss.xsl.aspx?id=524"?>
<rss xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Sarles, Jeffrey W.</title>
    <link>http://www.mayerbrown.com/</link>
    <description />
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright />
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 16:27:15 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <category>News</category>
      <description>Litigation &amp;amp; Dispute Resolution partners&amp;nbsp;Steve Shapiro, Jeff Sarles, Tim Bishop and Josh Yount (all Chicago) are recognized as "legal lions" of the week for their role advising Whirlpool Corp. in the US Supreme Court case &lt;em&gt;Whirlpool Corp. v. Glazer et al&lt;/em&gt;.</description>
      <link>http://www.mayerbrown.com/news/detail.aspx?news=2966</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">93b766de-b1f3-4813-a729-39a99a024150</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 20:59:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Law360's Weekly Verdict: Legal Lions &amp; Lambs</title>
    </item>
    <item>
      <category>Publication</category>
      <description>One of the hallmarks of private arbitration is the freedom of the parties to formulate their own rules and procedures for settling disputes. But just as the free market sometimes “fails” (by requiring limits on the freedom of market players), so too may defects in the machinery of international arbitration cry out for a bit of enlightened intervention.</description>
      <link>http://www.mayerbrown.com/publications/detail.aspx?publication=7965</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">cc689d95-b8ba-4179-b72f-08b83ec47ad1</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 19:06:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Solving the Arbitral Confidentiality Conundrum in International Arbitration</title>
    </item>
    <item>
      <category>Publication</category>
      <link>http://www.mayerbrown.com/publications/detail.aspx?publication=8720</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b1b6f545-12c9-4892-ab60-cabd0cfea9fd</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 19:20:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>The Nuts and Bolts of International Arbitration</title>
    </item>
    <item>
      <category>News</category>
      <description>In a bylined article, Litigation &amp;amp; Dispute Resolution partner Jeff Sarles (Chicago)&amp;nbsp;discusses what companies need to know before entering international arbitration.</description>
      <link>http://www.mayerbrown.com/news/detail.aspx?news=2763</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7a82e70b-fa1a-4e87-a0d4-73ae6a9bbde8</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 22:12:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>The Nuts and Bolts of International Arbitration</title>
    </item>
    <item>
      <category>Publication</category>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, in &lt;em&gt;Consorcio Ecuatoriano de Telecomunicaciones S.A. v. JAS Forwarding (USA), Inc.&lt;/em&gt;, has held that a foreign arbitration panel is a “tribunal” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. §1782, thereby authorizing parties to such arbitrations to seek discovery from a United States district court pursuant to that statute.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.mayerbrown.com/publications/detail.aspx?publication=8156</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e9ca5823-49e1-49f4-80a6-47d0c6d2c645</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 20:42:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Holds that Parties in Foreign Commercial Arbitrations May Seek Discovery in the United States</title>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>